You can run multiple instances of MakeMKV and a DVD should take just 5-10 minutes to remux. To dismount your ISO, RC on the DVD drive for the ISO then click Eject. You'll end up with a losslessly-copied MPG of your movie. You only need to do this once in a session. If it only processes the first VOB, reboot you computer and DVDVOB2MPG will then process all the VOBs. If you have selected more than one VOB eg a multi-VOB movie, make sure the program processes all the VOBs by watching the progress bar. If necessary, add ".mpg" as the file extension in the "Save as MPG." filename box.Ĭlick Convert. The main movie VOBs can be spotted by files being 1048mb with the last one of the movie probably being less.īack on the DVDVOB2MPG main screen, tick "convert output files and add them to one single file". Double-click to open it then highlight the movie VOBs (one movie at a time eg there may be multiple VOBs and multiple movies eg trailers, shorts). Open DVDVOB2MPG and use the Select button to navigate to the mounted VIDEO_TS. The ISO will appear as a DVD drive on the left side of Windows Explorer.Ĭlick it and the VIDEO_TS folder will be visible on the right. Mount the ISO in Windows Explorer (Windows 10) and then use DVDVOB2MPG to join the VOBs for each movie into one MPG. If you're not worried about file size, do a lossless convert as follows. if re-encode is always necessary (I don't know.) then I might as well just use Video Mastering Works. As said, the file size isn't important)ģ. in case of using VidCoder - what settings should I use ? (to get close to the original 720x576. is it always necessary to re-encode? so it always take maybe an hour or more to convert?Ģ. I tried with 1 profile already, but the output was 5.2GB (source 4.2GB)Īnother attempt with xMediaRecode resulted in a file that could not be played (see below)ġ. I don't mind the file size, as long as it isn't bigger than the source.Īlso my selections result in long encoding times (see screenshot) In VidCoder I should choose a profile, but honestly I would not know what to choose to get at least close to the source quality. VidCoder shows this as details of the source. I should install MKVToolNixīut after that Windows Defender blocks this tool. I prefer not to use BatchMKV, although it is highly recommended. XMediaRecode (same as VidCoder and VLC, so I have 3 converters running)Īnd also have used TMPGEnc Video Mastering Works. VidCoder (currently running converting an. Have been looking all over on Internet for the last day. This is done so that the corresponding video and audio are close together within the file making it easier to play and less strenuous on the drive - rather than say, putting all the video at the start of the file and all the audio at the end of the file (appending rather than interleaving) which would require the drive seeking back and forth over long distances to get successive video and audio frames.I would like to convert quite a number of. two frames of video, two frames of audio, two frames of video, two frames of audio, etc.). This might be done frame by frame (one frame of video, one frame of audio, another frame of video another frame of audio, etc.) or by some other grouping (e.g. I.e., the data within the file consists of a little video followed by a little audio, followed by a little more video and a little more audio, etc. It's called "multiplexing" because audio and video data are interleaved. The cake is still the same cake, just the box is different. It's like taking a cake out of one box and putting it into another box. Re-multiplexing is the process of taking the compressed (or not) audio and video (and possibly other streams) out of one file and putting them into another (the container may be the same type or not) without decompressing and re-compressing them. Of course a (re-)muxing process natively, has nothing to do with re-encoding, de-interlacing, etc. So again, IMO it's about how you (want to) look at it. Or, if one tries to resolve an issue by muxing a sourcefile only with added/other muxing-settings, I would call that a remux too. Suppose you import a mkv into mkvtoolnix, drop a source-subtitle and add another one, mux to mkv again. In my view, the word remux would not only be used when "keeping original source streams and mux into another container". It's subject to consideration indeed, as ron spencer stated. Pre-playback, software de-interlacing for me forcibly comes into play when I need to slow-down certain sped-up (24fps based) PAL music material to native speed (4% speed-change for music is awfully much and can completely devastate groove & rhythm and tonal experience).Īs for the "remux phrase" itself, it's how you want to look at it. As stated earlier, it often is better to leave it as-is. Normally I let my player or tv take care of de-interlacing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |